Get educated... Don't take our word for it.  Research.  Learn. Don't be Manipulated.

View my very extensive mp3 list (opens in a new window).

napster

By RON HARRIS, Associated Press Writer

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Napster Inc. must stop allowing the millions of music fans who use its Internet-based service to share copyrighted material, a federal appeals court ruled Monday.

In a ruling that Napster officials had said could force the file-swapping clearinghouse to shut down, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Napster must prevent users from gaining access to copyrighted content through the lists of songs archived by its users.

"This is a clear victory. The court of appeals found that the injunction is not only warranted, but required. And it ruled in our favor on every legal issue presented,'' said Hilary Rosen, president and CEO of the Recording Industry Association of America.

But, Ms. Rosen, is the victory worth alienating the thousands of consumers that the RIAA has fucked since the early 1980's? We shall see.

Link to me (copy the code below):

<a href="http://village.fortunecity.com/windsor/78/riaa/index.htm" target="_blank">
</a>

Napster officials weren't immediately available for comment, though they have scheduled a press conference at 2:30 EST.

In a 58-page opinion, a three-judge panel told a lower court judge to rewrite her injunction to focus more narrowly on the copyrighted material. The panel also directed the Redwood City-based company to remove links to users trading copyrighted songs stored as MP3 files.

The appeals court said it was apparent that "Napster has knowledge, both actual and constructive, of direct infringement.''

Napster has argued it is not to blame for its subscribers' use of copyrighted material, citing the Sony Betamax decision of 1984, in which the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hold VCR manufacturers and videotape retailers liable for people copying movies.

But the appeals court said no such protection extends to Napster because the company clearly knew its users were swapping copyrighted songs.

Napster can stay in business until U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel retools her injunction, which the appellate court called overly broad.

"We, therefore, conclude that the district court made sound findings related to Napster's deleterious effect on the present and future digital download market,'' the appeals court ruled. "Having digital downloads available for free on the Napster system necessarily harms the copyright holders' attempts to charge for the same downloads.''

Millions of users had flooded the company's computer servers this past weekend to download free music, fearing an immediate shutdown of the service that has changed the face of music. Napster claims to have an estimated 50 million users.

Webnoize, which monitors the digital entertainment economy, estimated that 250 million songs were downloaded using Napster over the weekend. Webnoize said that, on average, 1.5 million users were logged on to the system at any one time.

Major record labels hope Monday's ruling will force millions of computer users to start paying for music the online music swapping service has allowed them to get for free.

The digital music technology Napster made popular is here to stay either way. The recording industry appears stymied by the notion of funneling music to consumers via the Internet for a price while freely available computer applications allow even the computer novice to do it for free.

The five largest record labels - Sony, Warner, BMG, EMI and Universal - sued as soon as Napster took off, saying it could rob them of billions of dollars in profits.

In May 1999, Napster founder Shawn Fanning released software that made it easy for personal computer users to locate and trade songs they had stored as computer files in the MP3 format, which crunches digital recordings down to manageable lengths without sacrificing quality.

The concept of "peer-to-peer'' song trading quickly proved too popular to contain. As Napster users grew by the millions, other file-sharing programs also popped up, such as Gnutella and Freenet. And the labels themselves are looking to use the same technology, only with paying subscribers and secure digital formats that prevent copying.

After the appellate judges began deliberating in October, Napster made agreements with former business foes like Bertelsmann AG, the parent company of the BMG music unit. The German media giant has promised much-needed capital if Napster switches to a subscription-based service that pays artists' royalties.

The other four major labels not reached any similar agreement.